Use a newer version of ec in task definition #926
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This should not be merged until *after* https://issues.redhat.com/browse/EC-518 is resolved, since right now there are not v0.2 images of ec pushed out to registry.redhat.io. (Long story.) It's expected this will resolve the root cause of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHTAPBUGS-1212 I'm aware of the dire warning at the top of this file, but IIUC this PR to change ref does indeed belong here.
|
@joejstuart do you agree this PR does belong here? |
|
|
Draft until I can resolve EC-518. |
|
|
zregvart
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should not be merged until after
EC-518 is resolved, since right now there are not v0.2 images of ec pushed out to registry.redhat.io. (Long story.)
It's expected this will resolve the root cause of
RHTAPBUGS-1212
I'm aware of the dire warning at the top of this file, but IIUC this PR to change ref does indeed belong here.